Why Pacific Ocean Seafood Is A Serious Health Hazard

Why Pacific Ocean Seafood Is A Serious Health Hazard

Why Pacific Ocean Seafood is a Serious Health Hazard

There are many bloggers & journalists currently writing about how seafood from the pacific is perfectly healthy to eat after the triple meltdown in Japan. Yet, people across the US and world are concerned about the safety of Pacific Ocean seafood.

In this article I’m going to show why these fears have merit and why there is a serious risk to health in eating Pacific seafood.

Before we get started let me explain that we won’t be talking about health risks due to mercury or other heavy metals nor will we be discussing other chemical or toxic hazards in sea life of the Pacific. We’ll be talking exclusively about health risks due to radioactive contamination.

Some Definitions

Before we get started here are a few terms we’ll be using and their definitions:

Becquerel (Bq) — A measurement of the Activity or disintegrations per second of radio-isotopes, usually compared with Kilograms(Kg) or Grams(g) of a substance. It’s generally an overall measurement of radioactivity of a given substance. Example a measurement of 1,000 Bq/Kg is 1,000 emissions of Alpha/Beta/Gamma radiation per second per Kilogram of the substance tested.

Half-life — The time in which the radiation of a radioactive isotope falls or decays to half of it’s original value. Typically with radioactive substances a magnitude of 10 is used to determine when the radiation will be completely gone. For example Cesium 137 has a half-life of just over 30 years, which means that it will take 300 years for a cesium contaminated substance to become completely non-radioactive.

A Long History of Pacific Ocean Radiological Contamination

Since the summer of 1946 and through 1962 the United States detonated over 100 nuclear bombs and hydrogen bombs with the equivalence of over 200 megatons of TNT. In addition the enormous explosive and destructive power of these detonations is the unfathomable amounts of radiation released.

Firstly, the nuclear criticalities and explosions released huge amounts of Alpha, Beta, and Gamma radiation within their blast zones. Secondly, these bombs spread radioactive particles up into the upper atmosphere which spread and deposited around the world.

The direct blast zones and the areas near them were severely contaminated with radiation and several islands and their inhabitants were irradiated. The nuclear bomb testing done in the Pacific Proving Grounds also raised the overall contamination level of the entire Pacific Ocean as well as raising the cancer risk for all peoples who eat anything caught from the Pacific Ocean.

Between 1946 and 1993 the U.S. and U.S.S.R. dumped over 1,000 TeraBecquerels (1,000,000,000,000,000) of radioactive waste into the Pacific Ocean alone of over 200 radioactive isotopes produced in the enrichment of nuclear fuels, radioactive wastes from nuclear testing, nuclear power plants, and other medical radioactive contaminants.(source)

All of this history of contamination has raised the overall radiation levels in the Pacific as well as in most of the biological organisms in the ocean.

Continuous Ongoing Contamination From Fukushima Meltdowns

The triple meltdown in Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant in March 2011 released untold amounts of radioactive particles into the atmosphere. Nuclear expert Arnie Gundersen believes the total amount of noble gas released to be 3 times that of Chernobyl, and the Cesium(137 & 134) and Iodine 131 to be equal to Chernobyl.

This was fortunate for Japan, however not so for the western United States and the Pacific. These huge plumes of radioactive particles and gas blew over the Pacific contaminating much of the surface waters and then descended all across the U.S. and Canada.

Since the Fukushima disaster Tokyo Electric Power Company(TEPCO) has had to continuously dump at least 300 tons of seawater onto the 3 reactors. They put much of it into make shift tank farms however many of those tanks have been leaking.

Last week TEPCO admitted that the destroyed reactors have been leaking 300 metric tons (approx 80,000 gallons) per day of highly contaminated water from the very beginning of the accident.

Much of the contaminated water is in reactor’s basement tunnels which are constantly flooded due to the water being pumped into the reactors to keep them cool. The water in these tunnels has tested at 2.35 Billion Becquerels per liter of contamination.

They also believe that the groundwater from the hills is flowing into the tunnels through the damage from the quake and explosions and from there into the sea.

Much worse than this however is the fact that TEPCO and the Japanese government will have to pump water into these reactors for at least the next 30 – 40 years! They still have no way of stopping this contaminated water from flowing into the Pacific.

Currently TEPCO and the Japanese government is attempting to erect a frozen wall underground to stop the water flowing into the Pacific, but clearly this is a very short term fix and will not hold back the water for very long.

Three Missing Nuclear Reactor Cores

To add to the increasing radioactive contamination is the problem of where the reactor cores are located. TEPCO believes that the cores are sitting at the bottom of the concrete primary containment structures.

A more likely situation is that the cores have either melted through the concrete containment floors and into the earth, or seeped through the cracks in the containment from the quake and into the earth in what is called a China Syndrome.

Either way if the cores (corium) are outside of the reactor containments there is no barrier keeping the huge amounts of radiation from leaking uncontrolled into the environment indefinitely.

What’s worse is the radiation is so high in reactor 3 that no human can get anywhere close to the reactor building to even do an inspection. The radiation is so high that they have lost at least 3 robots trying to inspect the reactors.

Japanese Government Exporting Contaminated Seafood

Japanese Government Exporting Contaminated Seafood

While the Japanese government is testing it’s seafood and produce for radiation and rejecting the contaminated portions, they are however exporting these same contaminated products to countries like the United States and Canada after they have exceeded Maximum Contamination Levels(MCL) deemed by the Japanese government.

Meanwhile the United States government(FDA & EPA) has long ago stopped testing imported seafood from Japan and the EPA has actually raised the acceptable levels of contamination in the U.S.

There’s enough of a concern about the contamination that the American Medical Association has called on the FDA to monitor and test all seafood for radiation contamination, however the FDA has so far ignored the resolution.

Radioactive Bioaccumulation

The most important factor in our future health risk to eating food from the Pacific ocean is to a phenomenon called bioaccumulation. This is the process by which a contaminate is ingested or absorbed by lower forms of life which are then ingested and concentrated by higher and higher forms of life on up the food chain.

The highest forms of life high atop the food chain (think Humans) receive the highest doses of accumulated toxins & contaminates when they eat animals that have been contaminated by their own food.

This process while very harmful with toxic chemicals and heavy metals such as mercury in fish, is made much worse when applied to radioactive contaminates.

For example, one of the most harmful radioactive contaminates is Cesium 137, which has a half-life of 30 years. It is readily soluble in water as a radioactive salt, and when absorbed by animals it mimics potassium and goes into the muscle tissues. These contaminated muscle tissues concentrate the cesium levels in the predators that eat it, and so on up the food chain.

By the time we reach the human on the food chain, there is a significant amount of radioactive contamination in the food, and this contamination lasts for hundreds to thousands of years in the food chain.

External VS Internal Radiation

One of the main problems with proponents of the nuclear industry is their reliance upon a “old world” radiation risk model that was developed in the 50’s before the discovery of DNA. All of the “acceptable levels” of radiation established by governments around the world are based upon this old risk model of exposure, that an internal exposure in an organism would be the same as an external exposure.

However, years and years of studies on low level radiation and their effects show the exact opposite. Professor Chris Busby would even equate external vs internal exposure like one warming oneself in front of a fire vs eating a hot coal.

When organisms ingest radioactive isotopes, these isotopes readily mimic ordinary compounds and are absorbed into the body and not excreted out as many other toxins would be. Once these particles are absorbed into the body they bypass the body’s defense mechanisms and begin wreaking havoc to many of our most sensitive organs.

Exposure to Strontium 90 such as those in Chernobyl produces cancer in the bones or Leukemia. Exposure to Cesium 137 & 134 produces a devastating condition called Chernobyl heart in which the cardiac muscles are severely damaged and inhibit their function, the kidneys, liver and metabolism are all damaged beyond repair. There are numerous other peer reviewed studies on the people in the Ukraine, and surrounding areas of Chernobyl that show the devastating effects of internal radiation.

Verdict: Should You Eat Pacific Ocean Seafood?

We can see now that the Pacific Ocean has had a long history of radiation contamination by governments, the nuclear & medical industries. Since the Fukushima Meltdown the contamination of the Pacific has grown much worse with no end in sight.

Knowing the difference in radiation exposures also helps us understand why the seafood from the Pacific would present a continuing health threat that will get worse over time not better due to the ongoing disaster.

It would be wise for us to avoid eating any seafood or any other organism from the Pacific with special caution about Japanese caught seafood.

** Want to read more on the subject? I recommend Nuclear Power Is Not the Answer by Dr. Helen Caldicott.

The following two tabs change content below.
Adam Pruitt

Adam Pruitt

A Christian Unschooling father of 4 wonderful boys and husband to Vanessa Pruitt, Founder of Natural Family Today.

10 thoughts on “Why Pacific Ocean Seafood Is A Serious Health Hazard

  1. Jenn

    I wonder if anyone in the FDA has a grandchild who at this very moment is eating fishsticks. Do they gamble and hope that there’s not radioactive particles in there that will eventually irradiate every cell it comes into contact with? Or do they just put their feet up and figure it’s all part of doing business.

    1. Adam PruittAdam Pruitt

      I’m guessing many public servants who aren’t in the know, just believe whatever the government tells them. After all “the government knows what’s best for you” right? Those who know about the radiation believe the lie nuclear proponent scientists have spewed out since the 50’s, that radiation is good for you.

    1. Adam PruittAdam Pruitt

      I completely agree with you there, it is indeed terrifying. What scares me the most is how governments around the world are whitewashing this and covering it up. Part of the reason I threw this together is to help get the word out about the situation going on in the Pacific with the nightmare in Fukushima. The other part is to help raise awareness about the problems with nuclear power. As people are turning away from GMO’s and heavily processed foods and more towards natural, healthier foods they naturally turn towards seafood, and for many great reasons. It’s important to know the sources of our foods and the dangers if any that they may present.

    1. Adam PruittAdam Pruitt

      Here is another danger of radiation and radio-nuclides. When we ingest these particles our body treats them exactly as it would their non-radioactive counterparts as our bodies don’t see the difference between the two. So our bodies don’t have any real ways to “detox” radioactive substances. Our best means of preventing internal contamination is by avoiding known contaminated sources or even suspected sources (such as the Pacific Ocean). If there is a definite risk of radiation exposure some supplements can help against certain radioactive particles. An example is protection from Iodine 131, the radioactive counterpart to Iodine, which is absorbed by the Thyroid gland. The idea of protection from Iodine 131 is to basically overload the thyroid with Iodine so that when exposed to the radioactive Iodine it is not absorbed. This does work for short periods, however it probably isn’t wise to overload the body with supplements for long periods. Also it should be noted that Iodine 131 has a half-life of 8 days, meaning that after 80 days it is decayed enough to be non-radioactive, so Iodine supplementation only helps immediately after an exposure as Iodine 131 rapidly decays to more stable isotopes. Cesium 137 mimics potassium in the body and is taken up by the muscles, specifically the heart muscle. Cesium is excreted normally though so there is a chance of natural removal through the bodies natural processes. Strontium 90 is probably the most dangerous to Humans as it mimics calcium and goes to the bones. What makes it even more dangerous than Cesium is the fact that it is absorbed into the bone tissue and not excreted as Iodine or Cesium can be making it’s radiation much more dangerous.

  2. David

    I believe this whole thing is blown out of proportion. My father is a commercial fisherman and harvests Dungeness crab off the California coast and personally witnessed his buyer inspect catches with a geiger counter and found negligible radiation compared to the background. All of this is speculation without any direct evidence that Pacific caught seafood this far from Japan contains any abnormal amount of radioactive isotopes.

    1. Adam PruittAdam Pruitt Post author

      I understand your concerns however I have a few problems with your reply. Firstly the main source of contamination at this point is through fish such as tuna, salmon etc that have large migratory patterns and have been heavily dosed with radiation due to being in close proximity to the contamination in Japanese waters and also due to bio-accumulation in the food chain of fish. Secondly, your assertion that simply scanning a food with a Geiger counter is a good way to detect radiation in food is flawed. If this were the case then we would not need serious radiological testing of any food as anyone could simply scan it with a Geiger counter. I’m no radiation expert however I do know that in order to determine the true radiological contamination of a substance you have to examine it with specific lab equipment such as gamma spectrometer. If one were to use a Geiger counter to inspect food for contamination one would have to have a specific type of counter that was sensitive enough to measure both gamma AND Alpha radiation (most Geiger Counters do not measure Alpha radiation). One would also need to do a controlled timed testing in a controlled environment to gather verifiable results as unless the food is extremely contaminated it would not show anything on a simple pass of a Geiger counter due to the limited nature of the detection ability of the counter as well as the nature of how it detects radiation. Your assertion that what your father witnessed is evidence of non-contamination is unsound. However there would be a surefire way of putting this argument to rest and assure all of Americans that the food is safe if our government were to ACTUALLY test the food and release the results to the public which they have refused to do. So my challenge to you is ask our government why they refuse to test a food that has a much higher risk of being contaminated thereby reassuring the public that the food is safe.

  3. Dean Phelps

    Excellent article. I have also read the U.S. Government closed most or all of the testing stations on the West coast in addition to raising the “safe” acceptable level of radiation exposure to twenty times higher than the pre-Fukushima “safe” level.

  4. bertram

    hi great stuff…so where is the tipping point….200 hunded years of continuous abuse of our planet…fukushima the latest…what about the next one …the world is full of marvel that our greatest hope is to leave something for our kids to see…the planet is fine ..its us who are at risk mostly because of pride and ego that somehow completion will solve it all..
    mankinds been around for a lot longer than the last hundered years living within the boundaries of what nature provides
    .happier for it ..I like fishing ..did some commercial in a trawler. kinda sad that we have to be afraid of what we catch because of the catastrophic lapse of consciousness of the miracle workers who build faulty plants on the sea..hey great view ..shame about the wave that showed up ,…I build in the bible it says build on rock not sand that means literally and spiritually…now we watch as our planet and us slowly decay into the history books. if only we would think it all thru before the fact thereby avoiding the ass covering sanctimonious arrogant father knows best , wow how many biz.science,economic math , political science degrees did it take to screw up ..from fukishima to the crash of 2008 to pick one


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

CommentLuv badge

Natural Shop

About Me

Hi, I’m Vanessa. I’m a Wellness Coach and I’m passionate about helping people live happier, healthier, more natural lives. Learn more...

Let’s Connect

Free When You Subscribe

Free Ebooks

Around The Web

Natural Living Search Portal