How Traditional Classrooms Hinder Creative Thinking

If you ask any employer or organization what are some of the most critical skills a person should have, creative thinking is usually one of the top three listed.  Creative thinking is not just for artists and writers.  We use quite a few terms for creative thinking: creativity, divergent thinking, innovation, problem solving, etc.  It is essential for the evolution of ideas, the development of processes, and the invention of technologies.

The human brain was built for creativity and novel thought.  Man strives to create and solve things on every level of existence.

Creative thinking comes naturally for children. Their ability to explore, develop, synthesize, and organize new ideas is almost endless.  Just as it is expressed through curiosity and novelty, it should be encouraged to flourish.  The reality, too often, is that parents and teachers use techniques that hinder creative thought processes:

  • Learning by rote– conforming to fixed programs of information-stuffing; gathering of information without corresponding understanding of that information. The famed educator, Dr. Nathaniel Cantor, attests that “The essential goal of the American college remains that of fact-gathering.” Yet, as educators well know, about 90% of all rote learning is forgotten within 24 hours after it has been “learned.”
  • Pursuing rigid, standardized curricula– an unwavering devotion to a set of material that is focused on “catching up” with the past.
  • Learning outmoded disciplines– using methods or knowledge that is irrelevant or useless by the time a student graduates or has any use for it.
  • Rewarding the merely dutiful– to the penalty of the genuinely imaginative—bestowing “A’s” upon the docile little souls who write neatly, do all their homework, keep their noses clean, never argue (and promptly forget everything “learned” as soon as the grades are issued), while assigning mere passing grades and “trouble-maker” labels to the in­tellectually vigorous students who question the book, are skeptical of stock answers, or otherwise upset the placidity of classrooms by showing interest in subjects that goes beyond the books.

How are these practices so detrimental to creative thought?

1. They stop short of creativity

They impart information with­out teaching how to apply it to the creation of new ideas.

2. They train to refrain

They compel students to hold back their natural desires to create and problem solve until they have “mastered the subject”, by which time the student is accustomed to refraining from creative thought.

3. They encourage imitation

These practices are based on mimicry and recitation to the detriment of novel ideas.  New ways of completing the same tasks, thinking about the same problems, or looking at the same subject are often discouraged.  New tasks, problems, or subjects are not even addressed.

4. They create superficiality

They tempt the student to settle for the quickest, simplest, first-that-will-work, easiest-to-arrive-at answers that will get passing grades. Frequently, students also assume complacently that these are the final, or ultimate, answers when in reality the most that can be said for them is that they are merely the easiest-to-obtain answers of the moment in a world where answers of all sorts are forever being rendered obsolete by newer discoveries.

5.  They imply a static view of learning

These methods implant the notion that creativity is for later, and that the end goal of education is the accumulation of a set of knowledge, when in all reality the proper end-purpose of education is no such static thing—it is dynamic: it is to bring about intelligent action, which is practically synonymous with creation.

—————

The results of these hindrances to creative thinking, if subdued to them for a generous length of time, is that children become quite accustomed to conformity and lazy thinking.  If these tendencies are allowed to remain until adulthood, breaking free of such thought patterns can prove to be arduous and costly.  It is far better to encourage the natural creative thought processes in our young so that they may have sober minds and individuality.

In my next article I will address some approaches to encouraging creative thinking in our children as well as our own lives.

 

 

The following two tabs change content below.
Aadel Bussinger
Aadel has been married to her career Army man for 13 years and they have 2 daughters and a freshly made son. She is a homeschooling mom, volunteer, and online college student. Her hobbies include cooking, organic gardening, sewing, and crocheting. She blogs about their military, unschooling life at These Temporary Tents.
Aadel Bussinger

Latest posts by Aadel Bussinger (see all)

6 thoughts on “How Traditional Classrooms Hinder Creative Thinking

  1. As a middle-aged adult, I went back to college a few years ago for a new degree. Many of my classes had free-form assignments that required “critical thinking.” I was very intimidated at first, because I really didn’t even understand what they meant by “critical thinking.” Give me a true/false quiz, multiple choice, essay – those are all fine with me, but what’s this critical thinking business? After a while I caught on, and I must say, it made the examination process a learning experience as well. Good article.

  2. As a teacher in a public school, I’ve been exploring the internet for some new ideas for writers’ notebooks. Thanks for your information! To provide a counterpoint: my colleagues and I do indeed encourage creative thinking and critical analysis while exploring the interplay between contemporary issues and historical events. We constantly seek new ways to connect with students and bring the material into a relevant and meaningful context for students. Students who regurgitate information or follow the rules are not as successful as the students who challenge me, push back and create amazing things I never would have thought of. There are innovative and progressive schools and teachers out there, and it makes me sad that public schools are painted with a broad brush of stamping out creativity and individuality. Of course it is a slow process to change an institution, but the profession is filled with passionate individuals who work daily to move our education system forward to benefit ALL students. They are not without flaws, but there are also amazing opportunities provided to students in our public schools. Thank you!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Subscribe to Blog Updates!

**This page may contain affiliate links. This article is for informational and educational purposes only, and is not intended to diagnose or treat any medical condition. Please consult a qualified health professional on any matters regarding your health. Read full disclosure here.